Should the government offer students a voucher that they can use to attend private schools?

Yes, but only for low and mid-income families

Yes, we should offer vouchers for students and parents so they can use it to attend schools of their choice, especially for students who couldn't afford it and/or for those in poor-performing schools (except for religious schools) but provide equal advantages for students of all backgrounds and not put them at a disadvantage. However, we need to focus on improving our public schools first as well as its funding should be made better.

Yes, but it should only be left to state governments. We should offer vouchers for students and parents so they can use it to attend schools of their choice, especially for students who couldn't otherwise afford it and/or for those in poor-performing schools. However, we also need to improve our public schools as well as funding should be made better.

Yes, we can offer parents and students vouchers they can use to attend schools of their choice, but vouchers should come from states/counties if the school the child attends is failing in providing instruction and services, while we improve our public education system and better salaries for public school teachers. Public and private schools should coexist.

Yes, but I would rather we Christianize all education. Non-Christian parents should homeschool their children. Abolish and/or ban public schools.

Yes, but only for low income families, and privatize all education

Yes, but only for low income families

Yes, but only for students with exceptional athletic, academic, or service achievements

No, and ban private schools

Yes, but I would rather privatize all education

Yes

No

Yes, we can offer parents and students vouchers they can use to attend schools of their choice, but vouchers should come from the state/county, if the school the child attends is failing in providing instruction and services temporarily while we improve our public schools/education system.

Yes, we can offer parents and students vouchers they can use to attend schools of their choice, but vouchers should come from the state/county, if the school the child attends is failing in providing instruction and services, temporarily while we improve our public schools/education system and better salaries for teachers.

Yes, but it should only be left to state/local governments. We should offer vouchers for students and parents so they can use it to attend schools of their choice, especially for students who couldn't afford it and/or for those in poor-performing schools. However, we also need to improve our public schools as well as funding should be made better.

Yes, we should offer vouchers for students and parents so they can use it to attend schools of their choice, especially for students who couldn't afford it and/or for those in poor-performing schools, but with the exception of religious schools and provide equal advantages for students of all backgrounds. Other than that, we also need to improve our public schools as well as funding should be made better.

Yes, we should offer vouchers for students and parents so they can use it to attend schools of their choice, especially for students who couldn't afford it and/or for those in poor-performing schools, but it should only be left to state/local governments. However, we also need to improve our public schools as well as funding should be made better.

Yes, but we need to improve our public schools first then we can offer students vouchers they can use to attend schools of their choice. It should be used only for students who couldn't otherwise afford it, or for students in poor-performing schools. Vouchers should only be set on a state level.

Yes, we can offer vouchers for students and parents so they can use it to attend schools of their choice, but it should only be set on a state level. It should be used only for students who couldn't otherwise afford it, or for those in poor-performing schools. However, we need to improve our public schools first.

Yes, we should offer vouchers for students and parents so they can use it to attend schools of their choice, especially for students who couldn't otherwise afford it, or for those in poor-performing schools; it should only come from state governments. However, we need to improve our public schools as well as funding should be made better.

Yes, we should offer vouchers for students and parents so they can use it to attend schools of their choice, especially for students who couldn't afford it and/or for those in poor-performing schools, and it should only be left to state/local governments. However, we also need to improve our public schools as well as funding should be made better.

Yes, but it should only be left to state governments. We should offer vouchers for students and parents so they can use it to attend schools of their choice, especially for students who couldn't afford it and/or for those in poor-performing schools. However, we also need to improve our public schools as well as funding should be made better.

Yes, we should offer vouchers for students and parents so they can use it to attend schools of their choice, especially for students who couldn't otherwise afford it and/or for those in poor-performing schools, but it should only be left to state governments. However, we also need to improve our public schools as well as funding should be made better.

Yes; we can offer parents and students vouchers they can use to attend schools of their choice, but vouchers should come from the state/county if the school the child attends is failing in providing instruction and services, while we improve our public education system and better salaries for teachers.

Yes, we should offer vouchers for students and parents so they can use it to attend schools of their choice, especially for students who couldn't afford it and/or for those in poor-performing schools, but with the exception of religious schools and we should also provide equal advantages for students of all backgrounds and don't put them at a disadvantage. However, we need to improve our public schools first as well as its funding should be made better.

Yes, we should offer vouchers to low and middle-income students who couldn't afford it, or for those in poor-performing schools, so they can use it to attend schools of their choice. But provide equal advantages for students of all backgrounds and not put them at a disadvantage, while we improve our public schools, with better funding and improving wages for teachers.

Yes, but only to low and middle-income students who couldn't afford it, and for those in poor-performing schools, and provide equal advantages for students of all backgrounds instead of putting them at a disadvantage. However, more money should go towards funding and improving public schools first, while half of it should go towards vouchers.

Yes, we should offer vouchers to low and middle-income students who couldn't afford it, or for those in poor-performing schools, so they can use it to attend schools of their choice. But provide equal advantages for students of all backgrounds and not put them at a disadvantage, while we improve our public schools and its funding should be made better.

Yes, it should be offered for low and middle-income families, so that they can send their child to whichever school they feel is best for their child, whether if they chose public, or private (secular or religious) schools. But we should also improve our public schools and ensure that these funds are managed properly, and increase salaries for teachers in both public and private schools as well.

Yes, it should be offered for low and middle-income families, so that they can send their child to whichever school they feel is best for their child, whether if they chose public, or private (secular or religious) schools. But we should also improve our public schools and make sure they are properly funded, and increase salaries for teachers in both public and private schools.

Allow families to receive financial aid only up to the amount of school taxes they pay. Reasoning: Families should not have to double pay for public school their children do not attend in addition to private school.

Yes, by making tuition a tax credit.

Yes, because it encourages improvement due to competition between schools, helps lower income kids have better education, and lets the not-low-income kids have equal opportunity by having vouchers, too. We also need to improve our schools. Rather than funding them with local income taxes, which gives less funding to poor areas, schools should get funding from taxes from the entire country, and be made to reach equal standards. Fix the problem of teacher tenure preventing people from firing terrible teachers.

No, privatize all education instead

Yes, but only for secular private schools

Do not have an opinion

Yes and privatize grades 9-12

Yes and abolish grades 9-12

Yes but only if the voucher be no more than the cost of a student at a public school.

No, education should be run collectively.

Yes, but we should also focus on improving our public schools

It Depends, I don't want to ban private schools, but we should focus on improving our public schools instead.

Yes, but on the state and community levels.

Yes, but not just private schools. Vouchers should be applicable to any school, including good public schools.

Homeschooling is best.

Yes, it will help disadvantaged students

Keep the government out of school.

Yes, and get rid of public schools

No, end all subsidies

Yes, but at the same time focus on improving public schools

If there are outstanding achievements such as athleticism, academic, etc. then vouchers are okay. But the main focus should be on improving our public schools.

Yes, but only of the amount that would have been spent on them in their local school district. The parents still pay taxes for their local school district.

Yes, but only for low income families with exceptional athletic, academic, or service achievements

No, this will lessen needed funding for our public schools

Only in certain situations (if the school is in a bad area, etc)

Yes, but only if there is a service provided by the private school that is unavailable to them at their current school

Yes, but limit the amount of vouchers we give, so it doesn't come at the cost of public school funding.

Yes, I agree with the concept, but this should be decided at the state level

No, but privatize all public education.

Yes give a discount with recommendation

No, government should offer students and parent school choice programs instead.

Yes, but for students with exceptional academic, athletic, or other achievements.

Yes, for low-income families whose students are exceptional in athletic or academics

Yes, but it should be the state and local governments and not the federal government

Yes, but it should be the state governments and not the federal government.

Excuse me, WTF does that mean?

No, if we promote competition between schools that can start more violence between schools then there already is

Yes for low income families and for students with exceptional athletic, academic, or service achievements

Yes, If Private schools are required to educate ALL individuals like public schools.

No, they're call private schools for a reason.